|
Post by raphael on Jun 30, 2009 15:27:16 GMT -5
You could have at least made it green ^^^^! Looks like some el cheapo motel carpet where Raph one time spent the night. ;D
|
|
|
Post by bret on Jun 30, 2009 16:17:29 GMT -5
I took it from here. It's the Firefox logo. Apparently, aliens prefer Firefox over Internet Explorer.
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jun 30, 2009 17:15:27 GMT -5
There's just more people on the internet that are free thinkers and can think for themselves and don't need the government INC to do their thinking for them like most sheeple. Why does everything have to be about the evil government? I've never heard the government comment on crop circles. What is government anyway? It's just people like us. Are my friends who work for TVA in on all these government conspiracies? What about my mailman? I notice that he drives by my house almost every day so he must be up to something. Good one Bret! Now you make my arguement against government. Yes they are just like the rest of humanity. Every reason jails are full and reasons why small local governments are rampant with greed, corruption and everything else. Don't forget about the militarys black budget and things like 2.3 trillion still missing from the Pentagram. If you study the Roswell incident and the many credible witnesses you will see why I don't trust much of anything gubbermint excretes. Just another example!
|
|
|
Post by bret on Jun 30, 2009 22:49:27 GMT -5
I won't argue that there isn't corruption in the government and the military. But Roswell? C'mon man, you weren't even born when that happened. Get over it!
If you wanna talk government conspiracies then WTC7 and the missile plane that hit the Pentagon are much fresher topics.
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jun 30, 2009 23:32:30 GMT -5
I won't argue that there isn't corruption in the government and the military. But Roswell? C'mon man, you weren't even born when that happened. Get over it! If you wanna talk government conspiracies then WTC7 and the missile plane that hit the Pentagon are much fresher topics. I've read quite a bit on Roswell seems like it's very pertinent to what we are talking about. But eventually it will all come out once the power elite are flushed from all of Americas orifices permanently. I could talk about the 911 and the so called conspiracies. I've been following. I'm still waiting to see how this supposed active nano thermite that was found in the dust of 911 is going to pan out. One of my favorite site is Architects and Engineers for 911 truth... www.ae911truth.org/
|
|
|
Post by bret on Jul 1, 2009 9:49:57 GMT -5
I've read quite a bit on Roswell seems like it's very pertinent to what we are talking about. But eventually it will all come out once the power elite are flushed from all of Americas orifices permanently. It's been over 50 years. If the "power elite" (whatever that means) hasn't been flushed out by now, then it probably ain't gonna happen anytime soon. Maybe we should call Joe the Plumber?
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 1, 2009 10:02:52 GMT -5
If you wanna talk government conspiracies then WTC7 and the missile plane that hit the Pentagon are much fresher topics.
What is your take on these two things you mention?
|
|
|
Post by bret on Jul 1, 2009 12:58:37 GMT -5
If you wanna talk government conspiracies then WTC7 and the missile plane that hit the Pentagon are much fresher topics. What is your take on these two things you mention? My position is that WTC7 was a controlled demolition, and whatever hit the Pentagon and left that hole must not have had wings.
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 1, 2009 13:17:07 GMT -5
If you wanna talk government conspiracies then WTC7 and the missile plane that hit the Pentagon are much fresher topics. What is your take on these two things you mention? My position is that WTC7 was a controlled demolition, and whatever hit the Pentagon and left that hole must not have had wings. What proof or evidence leads you to believe this? Who did this?
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 2, 2009 8:47:33 GMT -5
Still no answer?
|
|
|
Post by bret on Jul 2, 2009 12:18:37 GMT -5
My position is that WTC7 was a controlled demolition, and whatever hit the Pentagon and left that hole must not have had wings. What proof or evidence leads you to believe this? Who did this? Video and photographic evidence. Who did it? Who knows? Of course the head of WTC7 is on record telling them to "pull it."
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 2, 2009 12:21:47 GMT -5
What proof or evidence leads you to believe this? Who did this? Video and photographic evidence. Who did it? Who knows? Of course the head of WTC7 is on record telling them to "pull it." That's not what the "experts" are saying. So that means your busting my chops over crop circles and other 'conspiracies" when in fact you believe in one of the grandest of them all. Wouldn't you say that's rather hypocritical?
|
|
|
Post by bret on Jul 2, 2009 13:16:18 GMT -5
The difference is that plenty of people have confessed and come out and shown how they make crop circles, and yet you still think they are created by aliens. There is no conflicting testimony. It's a hoax, just like the Loch Ness monster and Bigfoot.
You probably believe in Santa Claus as well.
In the WTC7 and Pentagon incidents we have seen one thing and we are being told another.
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 2, 2009 13:45:04 GMT -5
The difference is that plenty of people have confessed and come out and shown how they make crop circles, and yet you still think they are created by aliens. There is no conflicting testimony. It's a hoax, just like the Loch Ness monster and Bigfoot. You probably believe in Santa Claus as well. In the WTC7 and Pentagon incidents we have seen one thing and we are being told another. And you've failed to read any of the science that's behind the crop circles but go to some shmucks site who proclaims the science as a farce or whatever. Really makes you look like an idiot. Until you show one of these actual boobs that supposedly "confessed making one of these real intricate crop circles you have NOTHING but Al Gore hot air. Two of the newest made by the military and their late night drunken cohorts........
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 2, 2009 19:14:02 GMT -5
Again Gage brings up some good arguements. I've always had a major problem with WTC 7 and the way it came down. It absoutley makes NO sense to me. So for the government to say that burning jet fuel within the Twin Towers not only uniformly melted structural steel to the point of collapse—but brought the huge buildings down at near freefall speed—is the height of absurdity, not to mention that it is categorically impossible for fire to pulverize concrete. More than 90,000 tons of concrete was pulverized mid-air, along with metal decking. Blast waves blew out windows in buildings 400 feet away.
That third building that many Americans still are only dimly aware of, Building 7, really drives this issue home, in Gage's view. 'Well, the 600 architects I represent are most concerned about the freefall collapse of Building 7, the third skyscraper [that was] not hit by an airplane to fall on the afternoon of 9/11. This is a 47-story skyscraper that in the first hundred feet of its fall is falling at freefall speed. This is acknowledged by NIST. That can't happen unless the structure [underneath] is removed. There is no resistance from the structure to that fall in the first 2.25 seconds. So this of great concern. Of course it falls symmetrically almost at freefall speed and collapses thereafter—the whole building is destroyed in 6.5 seconds,' as he told AFP in an exclusive interview.www.americanfreepress.net/html/911architectsfortruth_32509.html
|
|
|
Post by bret on Jul 2, 2009 21:48:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 2, 2009 22:33:45 GMT -5
Ground photos of one of the ones you posted. Nothing earthshattering here.
Thanks for posting that! It just makes my arguement better. Tell me how hoaxers could have pulled all those perfect intricate wavy designs. I wish they would post the video on how they pulled that one off. ;D
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 3, 2009 12:33:30 GMT -5
Possible motives and oportunities regarding the demolition of the two large twin towers......
|
|
|
Post by bret on Jul 3, 2009 21:25:10 GMT -5
Ground photos of one of the ones you posted. Nothing earthshattering here.Thanks for posting that! It just makes my arguement better. Tell me how hoaxers could have pulled all those perfect intricate wavy designs. I wish they would post the video on how they pulled that one off. ;D It would be quite simple using just a heavy roller. The aliens got pretty sloppy on this job. You can see in this pic where they accidentally got the tires of their truck spaceship out of the rows.
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 3, 2009 21:46:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 7, 2009 11:51:23 GMT -5
Okay expert Bret! WTH is this? Start at about 4:15 and watch.....
|
|
|
Post by bret on Jul 7, 2009 12:57:50 GMT -5
Hard to tell from all that shaky spliced footage. Looks like reflections in a window to me.
That's also the first time I've seen someone filming a UFO stop and look into the camera and say, "I'm filming a UFO behind me."
Also notice how there is never any context when the spheres are shown. It's always just blue sky behind them as the camera bobs up and down. The one time you do see the UFO near clouds the camera cuts away as the yellow light goes in front of (not behind) the cloud. That would be consistent with my reflection theory.
An interesting fake, none the less.
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 12, 2009 14:58:28 GMT -5
Another credible military eyewitness steps forward. Former Deputy Base Commander Col Charles Halt claimed that even though the incident was later covered up, 'extra-terrestrials' had been the cause of the close encounter in Suffolk.
Halt had led a group of airmen who reported seeing a triangular UFO taking off into the air, leaving traces of radiation behind.
'The UFOs I saw were structured machines moving under intelligent control and operating beyond the realm of anything I have ever seen before or since,' the Daily Star quoted Col Halt, now retired, as telling investigator Gary Heseltine.
'I believe the objects that I saw at close quarters were extra-terrestrial in origin,' he said.
He added that the Air Force later issued 'dis-information' to throw the public off the scent. www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world-news/britains-biggest-ufo-mystery-revealed-by-air-force-base-chief_100215496.html
|
|
|
Post by bret on Jul 12, 2009 20:59:13 GMT -5
Well, if it's in the Thaindian News then it must be true!
|
|
|
Post by raphael on Jul 12, 2009 21:36:13 GMT -5
|
|