|
Post by dino on Sept 8, 2011 6:40:54 GMT -5
None of them have a stellar record to stand on that they themselves orchestrated...but Romney is still most presidential and he did very well last night.
Perry's meatheaded answers and demeanor makes him seem uneducated. Don't see this debate really propelling him any higher. He needs to present his plan for the future and it better be damn good or he's toast.
Ron Paul had a punch landed to the jaw for the first time...but that didn't really matter...he's gone about as far as he can go.
Cain definitely helped himself but I don't know how he can break through to another level.
Huntsman held his own and prolly has people taking a good look at him now.
The rest have no shot and not even worth a mention.
|
|
|
Post by Fredo on Sept 8, 2011 7:12:49 GMT -5
I hadn't paid much attention to either Huntsman or Perry before this. I thought Huntsman sounded pretty good but Romney is by far the most likely to move forward.
|
|
|
Post by dino on Sept 8, 2011 7:28:33 GMT -5
I liked Romney's 'we need to update our economy' statement...I think he's smart and an ideas guy who doesn't want to play political games. We need an out of the box thinker, a future thinker.
I think he could deal with the opposition.
|
|
|
Post by Sgt K USMC on Sept 8, 2011 8:30:05 GMT -5
I think Perry was the only one able to actually stand up with facts and figures showing what he has already done on the issues presented.
All anyone else could do was try to talk about how good their ideas would be should have been or could have been.
And no way on Huntsman… the man is named after a spider… nuff said.
|
|