|
Post by wheels on Sept 6, 2012 13:42:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by duke on Sept 6, 2012 16:19:35 GMT -5
Yep there are actually a lot of nuts there too. Almost as many that think that the businesses Romney's company purchased and raided had it coming and Romney actually had nothing to due with such vulture policies and therefore is entitled to keep the spoils of the war. The fact that Romney signed the corporate business form attesting to his responsibility for the company should be ignored in the interest of Romney's latest acquisition attempt, the Corporate United States. Which assets should Romney sell off first to provide funds to pay himself?
|
|
|
Post by wheels on Sept 7, 2012 12:36:56 GMT -5
Yep there are actually a lot of nuts there too. Almost as many that think that the businesses Romney's company purchased and raided had it coming and Romney actually had nothing to due with such vulture policies and therefore is entitled to keep the spoils of the war. The fact that Romney signed the corporate business form attesting to his responsibility for the company should be ignored in the interest of Romney's latest acquisition attempt, the Corporate United States. Which assets should Romney sell off first to provide funds to pay himself? it's apparent that this is going to be the left's birther issue.
|
|
|
Post by Sgt K USMC on Sept 7, 2012 14:22:53 GMT -5
I thought it was Romney only releasing the Federally required amount of tx documents that was going to be their 'Birther' issue.
|
|
|
Post by wheels on Sept 7, 2012 15:37:12 GMT -5
bain capital, tax returns... who knows? they may have several silly issues that don't impact how the man would govern.
as for the topic of this thread, i find it simply amazing that so many democrat delegates think that profits are shameful and dirty. do they not realize that there would be zero small businesses if profits were banned?
|
|
|
Post by wheels on Sept 7, 2012 15:41:24 GMT -5
btw, did the occupy dolts show up to the D convention or did i miss the coverage? they were all torn up about the lack of participants at the R convention and said that they would show up in charlotte in force.
|
|
|
Post by Sgt K USMC on Sept 8, 2012 10:14:54 GMT -5
Naaa.... none of them had photo ID's.
|
|
|
Post by duke on Sept 8, 2012 10:51:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Sgt K USMC on Sept 10, 2012 6:31:56 GMT -5
No… actually it's OBVIOUSLY Sarcasm. Specifically directed at the fact that the DNC would not let anyone into the convention without a photo ID. You know… the thing they consider to be racist when required to vote, but A-OK when required to drive…
|
|
|
Post by duke on Sept 10, 2012 7:40:09 GMT -5
Protests are normally outside the venue where a photo ID is not required. I do not have a photo ID to drive in TN. I'm also older than 55, the age when vehicle operators are not required to have a photo License n Tennessee.
Personally, I hate any photo ID system and any demand to display such. But all political parties are in the business of strengthening their own party for the sake of power and the money that can be siphoned off for person gain. Part of that power is micro management of the lesser individuals as viewed by the electorate.
|
|
|
Post by wheels on Sept 10, 2012 12:15:42 GMT -5
so, basically, the occupy group had a dismal showing again. thanks for the info.
|
|